Codger on Politics

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Stamp out Political Islam

Stamp out Political Islam

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324767004578486931383069840.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories

"Of course, the question alone would do nothing to uncover deceit on the part of a determined terrorist. But it would establish the principle that adherence to political Islam, with its dreams of a society ruled by Shariah (not to mention a world ruled by a restored caliphate), is incompatible with the terms of the oath of allegiance."

The author suggests the believers in Political Islam have view incompatible with American democracy. And further suggests screening such people and preventing them entry into the US as was done with communism.


Sent from my iPad

Friday, May 17, 2013

Newspeak from fearless leader class individual

Newspeak from fearless leader class individual

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sec-kathleen-sebelius/secretary-sebelius-whats_b_3288382.html

Five points were made and all were wrong.
1. Repeal will restore access to medical care, Obomacare is killing it.
2. Repeal will be good for seniors. The government is meddling in your life, and might well terminate you if they question your value.
3. Repeal will lower taxes.
4. Repeal returns cool to the market, and to you
5. Repeal means you won't be forced to be a codependent to degenerate lifestyles.


Sent from my iPad

Newspeak from fearless leader class individual

Newspeak from fearless leader class individual

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sec-kathleen-sebelius/secretary-sebelius-whats_b_3288382.html

Five points were made and all were wrong.
1. Repeal will restore access to medical care, Obomacare is killing it.
2. Repeal will be good for seniors. The government is meddling in your life, and might well terminate you if they question your value.
3. Repeal will lower taxes.
4. Repeal returns cool to the market, and to you
5. Repeal means you won't be forced to be a codependent to degenerate lifestyles.


Sent from my iPad

Monday, May 13, 2013

The anti intellectual Science believers

The anti intellectual Science believers


http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-coming-gop-civil-war-over-climate-change-20130509

"Kerry Emanuel registered as a Republican as soon he turned 18, in 1973. The aspiring scientist was turned off by what he saw as the Left's blind ideology. "I had friends who denied Pol Pot was killing people in Cambodia," he says. "I reacted very badly to the triumph of ideology over reason" I agree with the 18 year old Kerry Emanual.

"Today, the professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is considered one of the United States' foremost authorities on climate change—particularly on how rising carbon pollution will increase the intensity of hurricane"

Is this growth or the result of the constant Liberal propaganda in the nations universities?

"" "There is a divide within the party," says Samuel Thernstrom, who served on President George W. Bush's Council on Environmental Quality and is now a scholar of environmental policy at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. "The position that climate change is a hoax is untenable." ""

And why is it untenable? We have faked experimental data, we have the lack of predicted temperature rise. we have the incredibly large payoff to the hoaxer if they can sell their position.


it is bad to question global warming.
You want to be good.
If you will believe the we we do, you will be good.
An idiot can follow this reasoning, others, not so much.


Thursday, May 09, 2013

Hurray, a non-government solution to the cost of education

Hurray, a non-government solution to the cost of education

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/may_june_2013/on_political_books/profs_in_the_cloud044520.php

"Higher Education in the Digital Age, a slim and highly readable volume, is built around Bowen's Tanner Lectures at Stanford University and includes reactions from four astute observers, Stanford President John Hennessy, Harvard education professor Howard Gardner, Columbia humanities scholar Andrew Delbanco, and Daphne Koller, president of the for-profit online education company Coursera. The collection of voices provides a thoughtful and provocative discussion of the emergence of online education, which Hennessy says is hitting colleges and universities with the force of a "tsunami."

Supporters of online learning argue that it has the potential to pull off a higher education hat trick: reduce costs, raise learning outcomes, and reduce inequalities. Bowen, an early skeptic, now declares himself a "convert," though one who adopts a measured tone. "I regard the prospects as promising, but also challenging," he suggests."

If you add to this volunteer tutors, the student could get more individual attention and the volunteer gets a refresher.

""Early in his career, Bowen helped identify the "cost disease" facing labor-intensive industries such as higher education and the performing arts, which have found it difficult to raise productivity. Bowen invokes Cornell economist Robert Frank's observation: "While productivity gains have made it possible to assemble cars with only a tiny fraction of the labor that was once required, it still takes four musicians nine minutes to perform Beethoven's String Quartet No. 4 in C minor, just as it did in the 19th century." To make matters worse, the wage premium for highly educated workers, like professors, has grown.""


"But will learning outcomes suffer as universities move to a greater reliance on online learning? Bowen argues that if online learning options are executed in the right way, outcomes won't suffer, and, indeed, should improve. Particularly promising, he suggests, is the "hybrid" approach, which mixes online lectures with face-to-face "active learning" sessions. This method, called "flipping the classroom," was found by one poll to receive 69 percent support from professors.

According to Bowen, the most rigorous study to date of online learning involves a randomized trial experiment of a "hybrid" statistics class designed by Carnegie Mellon University, taught mostly online with a once-a-week face-to-face question-and-answer session. The experiment involved 600 students, some of whom took the more expensive class in a traditional setting while others took less costly hybrid classes. The differences in completion rates and on tests were not statistically significant—and low-income students succeeded at comparable levels in the two sets of classes."

volunteer tutors would allow the student could get more individual attention and the acceptability of both student and volunteer would be continually tested. Students could continually discuss the abilities of there tutors with students migrating to the best. Students who were lazy or inept could be invited to leave by a volunteer. Survivors in both categories would continually
Improve. At some point the volunteers would surpass the professors. The remaining professors could be left to teach the laze and inept- for their fee .

"But skeptics—including Delbanco and Gardner—wonder if the hype is too good to be true. In education, there is often a trade-off between quality and cost. Just as an expensive ten-person seminar usually provides more meaningful learning opportunities than a 300-person lecture class, learning may also suffer in cheaper online classes designed for thousands."
Identified and solved. Use volunteers to man 30 ten person seminars, at no cost. Or of the class size is thousands, find volunteers in the hundreds.


Sent from my iPad

Monday, May 06, 2013

Progressives exposed for the selfish, self centered skumbags they are

Progressives exposed for the selfish, self centered skumbags they are

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2319192/Why-Left-hates-families-MELANIE-PHIILLIPS-reveals-selfish-sneers-Guardianistas-Left-actively-fosters--revels--family-breakdown-.html

"Their sanity was called into question. 'What do these people want?' one distinguished academic said to me.
'Do they want unhappy parents to stay together?'
Eventually, he admitted that the authors' research was correct. But he said it was impossible to turn back the clock and wondered why there was so much concern about the rights of the child rather than of the parents.
He turned out to be divorced — revealing a devastating pattern I was to encounter over and over again. Truth was being sacrificed to personal expediency. Evidence would be denied if the consequences were inconvenient.
Self-centred individualism and self-justification ruled, regardless of the damage done to others.
Surely, though, the essence of being 'progressive' was to protect the most vulnerable? "


""‘The worst damage to a child is always done by the traditional nuclear family!’

I could only gaze at him, defeated by the stupendous shallowness of such an attitude. 
The ones who were the most aggressive and offended, I noticed, were those who had walked out on their families or were cheating on their spouses.
This revealed another sad truth about the Left. What matters to them above all is that they are seen to be virtuous and compassionate. They simply cannot deal with the possibility that they might not be.
They deal with any such suggestion not by facing up to any harm they may be doing, but by shutting down the argument altogether. 
That’s because the banner behind which they march is not altruism, as they kid themselves. It is narcissism. 

"


Sunday, May 05, 2013

Life Mirrors Hunger Games Capitol

Life Mirrors Hunger Games Capitol

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/05/thriving_dcs_bubble_will_burst_118261.html

"The centralized power and wealth in our nation's capital are becoming so disconnected from the rest of this country that it is palpable to everyone except those who live in Washington.

In most people's lives, the driving issue is economic security. Washington's obsession is with social and cultural issues that drive bigger wedges between Us and Them.

It's only a matter of time before the rest of America's complaints will burst Washington's bubble. "





Sent from my iPad

Friday, May 03, 2013

Don't ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for you

Don't ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for you

http://prospect.org/article/emotion-and-reason-gun-debate

"Nevertheless, her story and others like it may not speak directly to whether we should have something like more comprehensive background checks. Gun rights supporters are fond of saying that expanded background checks wouldn't have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting, and strictly speaking that's true, since Adam Lanza got his guns from his mother, and since she wasn't an ex-felon"

" more comprehensive background checks" are not enough if only gun purchasers are checked. The check should be of anyone with a reasonable access to a gun. In our society, that means everyone.

The advantage of this procedure is that people who exercise their right to bare arms are not singled out. It would also catch those who break the law and obtain, or have access to illegal guns. After the background check, those having been found to be wanting can not only be prevented from purchasing a gun but can be prevented from access to areas where guns might reasonably be found. This would involve a GPS tracking device with arrest of those who enter restricted areas.

Does this sound like a police state? Not to worry, our government would never threaten your liberty. We are from the government and we are here to stop gun violence, and any other questionable activity.